Objective 3.1 | Project 2025 Tracker

Project2025 Tracker

Category 3: Politicizing the Department of Justice

Planned In Progress Completed  |  Click a dot to go back to Category

Objective 3.1 : Remove DOJ Independence

What It Means

White House controls DOJ decisions

Our Analysis: Dismantling the DOJ’s autonomy is how authoritarian regimes turn law enforcement into a political weapon. It's about shielding allies and punishing dissent.

Source References

Pages: 51, 52
Chapters: Chapter 5
Quotes: “The President’s constitutional authority to direct and supervise the work of subordinate officials within the Executive Branch must be respected and enforced.”

Methodology

This objective was derived from explicit language in Chapter 5 of the Project 2025 document describing the need for the DOJ to function under direct presidential authority. It echoes Trump-era arguments that the DOJ is not independent and should serve the President.

Tracking Notes

We are monitoring for actions that align with this intent, based on how this objective was derived: This objective w's derived from explicit language in Chapter 5 of the Project 2025 document describing the need for the DOJ to function under direct presidential authority. It echoes Trump-era arguments that the DOJ is not independent and should serve the President.

April 1, 2025 at 8:17 am: Status change: In March 2025, President Trump installed a close political ally as Attorney General—Richard Grenell—who has publicly emphasized that the Department of Justice should ''reflect the President''s vision for law enforcement.'' The move has raised concerns over the DOJ''s independence, aligning with Project 2025''s aim to consolidate executive control over the department.

Status: In Progress

Last Updated: April 7, 2025

Back to Top

Objective 3.2 : Appoint DOJ Loyalists

What It Means

Install Attorney General and deputies with political loyalty

Our Analysis: These appointments aren't about justice — they're about insurance. Installing loyalists protects corrupt actors and turns justice into a tool of the ruling class.

Source References

Pages: 50, 53
Chapters: Chapter 5
Quotes: “The President must be able to rely on political appointees who are fully aligned with the administration’s agenda.”

Methodology

Project 2025 clearly emphasizes staffing senior DOJ roles with ideologically loyal appointees. This reflects Trump’s prior attempts to install loyalists like Jeffrey Clark and his current efforts to remake DOJ leadership.

Tracking Notes

We are monitoring for actions that align with this intent, based on how this objective was derived: Project 2025 clearly emph'sizes staffing senior DOJ roles with ideologically loyal appointees. This reflects Trump's prior attempts to install loyalists like Jeffrey Clark and his current efforts to remake DOJ leadership.

April 1, 2025 at 8:17 am: Status change: In March 2025, President Trump appointed several Justice Department officials with longstanding ties to him or strongly aligned ideological views, including naming a new Deputy Attorney General known for defending Trump''s actions during his prior term. These moves reflect a broader push to reshape DOJ leadership consistent with Project 2025 objectives.

Status: In Progress

Last Updated: April 7, 2025

Back to Top

Objective 3.3 : Target Political Opponents

What It Means

Use DOJ to launch investigations

Our Analysis: Weaponizing the DOJ isn't law enforcement — it's elite enforcement. It’s how fear becomes governance.

Source References

Pages: 51–54
Chapters: Chapter 5
Quotes: “Federal law enforcement should not shrink from pursuing lawbreakers who occupy high offices, past or present.”

Methodology

Language about pursuing “lawbreakers in high office” is paired with Trump campaign rhetoric about prosecuting Biden, Fauci, and others. This objective reflects the intention to use DOJ as a political weapon.

Tracking Notes

We are monitoring for actions that align with this intent, based on how this objective was derived: Language about pursuing alawbreakers in high officea is paired with Trump campaign rhetoric about prosecuting Biden, Fauci, and others. This objective reflects the intention to use DOJ 's a political weapon.

April 1, 2025 at 8:17 am: Status change: In March 2025, the Department of Justice under the Trump administration opened a formal investigation into former Attorney General Merrick Garland for alleged abuse of power related to the 2022 Mar-a-Lago search. The investigation, widely viewed by legal experts as politically motivated, reflects the administration''s increased focus on targeting figures from the previous administration.

Status: In Progress

Last Updated: April 7, 2025

Back to Top

Objective 3.4 : Undermine DOJ Watchdogs

What It Means

Weaken IG and OPR oversight

Our Analysis: Removing internal oversight opens the floodgates for unchecked prosecutorial abuse, insulating the powerful from consequences and obliterating rule of law.

Source References

Pages: 52
Chapters: Chapter 5
Quotes: “The internal oversight bodies have become too insulated and must be reined in.”

Methodology

The chapter criticizes internal oversight bodies like the Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility. This aligns with Trump’s prior attempts to weaken oversight and remove internal critics.

Tracking Notes

We are monitoring for actions that align with this intent, based on how this objective was derived: The chapter criticizes internal oversight bodies like the Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility. This aligns with Trump's prior attempts to weaken oversight and remove internal critics.

April 1, 2025 at 8:17 am: Status change: In March 2025, the Trump administration initiated internal Justice Department reforms that included limiting the independence of the Office of the Inspector General and the Office of Professional Responsibility. According to senior officials cited by The New York Times, new directives now require these oversight bodies to coordinate more closely with senior political appointees before launching investigations, reducing their autonomy. This aligns with Project 2025's objective to weaken internal DOJ watchdogs.

Status: In Progress

Last Updated: April 7, 2025

Back to Top